2025 (11) TMI 517

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tushar Jarwal, Rahul Sateeja and Daliya Singh (VC) i/b. DMD Advocates. For the Respondent No. 2: Ms. Shruti Vyas a/w Niyati Mankad (VC), Ms. Priyanka Singh. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to the impugned order dated 28 February 2025. This order is appealable. However, it was pointed out to us that this order is made way beyond the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ible to do so" militates against the argument that under no circumstances can an order be made beyond the period of one year. 5. Mr Shah, however, submits that the reasons set out in the affidavit do not make out a case of impossibility, which is the standard to be applied in such matters. This argument will have to be tested by delving into factual issues. Besides, this argument is quite diffe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te remedies. 7. We refer to our decision in the case of Oberoi Constructions Ltd. vs. The Union of India and Ors. O.S. Writ Petition (L) No. 33260 of 2023 disposed of on 11.11.2024 instituted., in which we have considered this issue by relying upon several decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. By following the reasoning therein, as also the reasoning in the precedents referred to therein, we ....