2025 (11) TMI 495

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a For the Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Naveen Chandra Gupta ORDER 1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Shukla learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agrawal learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed to challenge the Adjudication Order dated 30.08.2024 passed by respondent No. 3 under Section 73 of the UPGST Act, 2017. By that order, total ta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. 24,10,004.96/-, whereas the Adjudication Order has created a total tax demand Rs. 41,71,718.3/-. 4. In view of such grounds raised, time was granted to the learned Standing Counsel to obtain instructions. While instructions are awaited, learned Standing Counsel would submit, at most the proceedings may be remitted in terms of the directions issued by this Court in M/s Riya Construction vs St....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve reason, in the present facts, distinction exists from the facts noted in M/s Riya Construction (supra). 8. Also, since glaring mistakes are apparent from record and no contrary instructions have been received by learned Standing Counsel, no useful purpose would be served in keeping such a petition pending any further. The impugned order dated 30.08.2024, 11.08.2025 and 31.08.2025 and the Sho....