2006 (1) TMI 144

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndamus forbearing the first respondent from collecting the recovery of arrears, Central Excise Duty, vide communication dated 24-11-2005 in C. No. IV/16/109/05 by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise dated 24-11-2005 confirmed vide order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (South Zonal Bench) in final order No. 825/05 dated 9-6-2005 [2005 (186) E.L.T. 410 (T.)]. 2. Adm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... petitioner received a demand notice dated 31-10-2005. The main contention of the petitioner is that since the application filed by the petitioner to set aside the order passed by the Tribunal is pending before the Tribunal, the first respondent should not have issued the demand notice. Such a contention is untenable. There is an order fixing the liability on the petitioner to pay the duty and whe....