Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (8) TMI 183

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short "the Tribunal") in Appeal No. E/1266/98-A whereby the Tribunal has set aside the order under appeal being without jurisdiction. The additional demand confirmed by the Commissioner and the penalty imposed under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (for short 'the Rules') have been vacated. 2. The short facts for det....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f duty with reference to two issues i.e. (i) realisation of transit insurance and (ii) on expenditure incurred by ARS (authorised representative) on the salaries of the FSEs (Field Service Engineers) on verification of documents/certificates; other seven items regarding which the assessee claimed that these expenditures incurred were post removal activities and not liable to be included in the ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Tribunal which has been disposed of by the impugned order. 7. The Tribunal, without fixing the assessable value and without setting aside the order of the Commissioner under appeal passed in pursuance to the order of remand dated 30-1-1995 on merits, accepted the appeal by observing that in view of its earlier order dated 27-11-1989 which was confirmed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 367....