Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Additions under s.40A(2)(b) disallowed where disclosed director remuneration was revenue-neutral and uncertified WhatsApp evidence insufficient.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT allowed both appeals, holding that the addition under s.40A(2)(b) for alleged excessive director's remuneration could not stand where the payee had disclosed the remuneration in her return and comparative statements established that taxation in the payee's hands exceeded any tax saving to the assessee-company, rendering the transaction revenue-neutral. The Tribunal also found the assessment order lacked adequate reliance on electronic records recovered during search (WhatsApp chats) and, applying recent Supreme Court guidance on admissibility of electronic evidence and the requirement of substantial compliance with prescribed certification protocols, concluded such chats without self-contained transactional proof were insufficient to sustain the additions; ground challenging the addition was therefore allowed.....