2005 (9) TMI 108

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missioner of Central Excise and Customs) under Section 35(H)(I) of Central Excise Act, 1944 for calling reference on the questions proposed by them from the Tribunal which according to the applicant arise out of the order dated 23-3-2000, passed by the Tribunal in Appeal No. E/1847/99-NB (DB) and Order No. A/310/2000-NB(DB). Following questions are proposed by the applicant for being called from t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the applicant to offer his comments ?" 2.Heard Shri Vinay Zelawat, learned Counsel for the applicant Union of India and Shri GM Chafekar, learned Senior Counsel with Shri R. Mukadam for non-applicant No. 1. None for the non-applicant No. 2. 3.Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and having perused record of the case, we are of the opinion that the application does not involve any re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....credit. We also note that even otherwise the Udaipur depot of M/s. Bongaingoan Refinery & Petrochemicals was registered as dealer on 1-9-94 and since any one who was registered on or before 31-12-94 could issue modvatable invoices. In the circumstances, the invoices issued by the Udaipur depot were valid documents and, therefore, they were valid documents for taking Modvat credit up to 31-12-94. W....