2005 (1) TMI 118
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ies. By letter dated 17-7-2002 (Annexure EF the Superintendent , Central Excise, A.R. IV, Div. v. Ahmedabad, directed the petitioner not to carry out any further removal of raw materials/semi-finished goods/finished goods under Self Removal Procedure and the SRP facility of the unit was withdrawn till further orders. Thereafter, by letter dated 26-7-2002 the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise, Di....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uthorities like the Director of Revenue (Intelligence) from carrying out necessary inquiry/investigation against the petitioner as well as Respondent No. 4 in respect of the allegations contained in the letter dated 26-7-2002 (Annexure : F). 2. It seems that in spite of this direction, issued to the respondents, nothing was done in the matter and ultimately on 17-9-2002 another Division Bench o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Systematic Corporation - present Respondent No. 4 for the exports made by it. Though served, the Respondent No. 4 has not made its appearance through any Advocate. 5. By letter dated 26-7-2002 (Annexure : F) it was found by the Dy. Commissioner, Central Excise, Div. v. Ahmedabad 1, that three exports were effected by the petitioner through its Merchant-Exporter M/s. Systematic Corporation, Mum....
TaxTMI