Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (5) TMI 71

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xcise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (in short "CEGAT") New Delhi, dated 22nd March, 2000. 2. The question is whether the Appellants are entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 52/86, dated 10th February, 1986. This Notification granted exemption from duty in respect of goods specified in the Schedule thereto. Item No. 11 of the Schedule reads as follows :- Sl. No. Heading or S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the benefit of the Notification. Their contention has not been accepted by any of the authorities including CEGAT. 4. Before us it was also sought to be submitted that resins are different from plastic. In our view, it is not necessary to go into the question whether resins are different from plastics. The classification list filed by the Appellants describes their own goods as under :- Sl. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....   (a) Unvarnished fibre glass cloth/Volan Silane treated glass cloth       (b) Unvarnished fibre glass tape 7014.00 MTR 5. Thus, for the purposes of classification and for the purposes of falling under Tariff Item No. 7014, the Appellants themselves have shown their goods to be impregnated, coated, covered and laminated with plastics or varnish. T....