Appeal dismissed: agency substitution left original investigation order intact; change procedural, not substantive, no rights affected

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the 03.01.2024 order merely substituted the investigating agency designated by the earlier 11.03.2020 order and did not constitute a recall or review of that order. The Tribunal found the principal order remained in full effect and the modification did not expand or alter its substantive objective; it only changed the machinery to carry out the previously authorized investigation. The change did not impinge on the appellant's legal rights or exceed NCLT's jurisdiction. Pendency of a writ filed by the respondent in the HC was held not to preclude independent adjudication by the Tribunal or necessitate interference with the impugned order.....