Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 1866

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ebasish Chowdhury, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv. ORDER The Court : No question of law is raised in the proposed appeal, but the Revenue asserts that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in providing for deductions despite the Transfer Pricing Officer finding that the payments made by the assessee to its Canadian associate were not against any services received from such as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vious orders on the similar issue passed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Appellate Tribunal questioned the basis of the opinion rendered by the TPO that such services were rendered uniformly to all associate concerns by the concerned associate of the assessee in the present case. The Appellate Tribunal found that the TPO had not rendered a finding that such services were rendered by the entity to a....