2003 (12) TMI 76
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed by learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel Mr. D.N. Patel for the respondents. At the request of the learned advocates, the petition is finally heard today. 2. The petitioner has been aggrieved by an order dated 3-7-2003 passed by respondent No. 2. 3. Learned advocate Mr. Paresh M. Dave appearing for the petitioner has mainly submitted that the impugned order is bad in law for ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... justify the order by saying that the reasons have already been incorporated by way of submissions of one of the parties in the order passed by the appellate authority. 5. We have heard the learned advocates and upon perusal of the impugned order, we see that the appellate authority has not recorded any reason as required under the Provisions of Section 35-A(iv) of the Act. It is pertinent to n....
TaxTMI