Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (3) TMI 118

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) dated 1-11-1999. 2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows : The Appellants are manufacturers of Grooved Rubber Sole Plates. They filed the classification list classifying their products under Tariff Item 4008.29. The Respondent insisted that the classification of their goods must be under Tariff Item No. 4016.99 and th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appeals) set aside the demand on the ground that the Board's Circular made it clear that these goods were classifiable under Tariff Item 4008.29 and the goods were to be cleared at nil rate of duty. 5. The Respondent carried the matter in Appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal has, by the impugned Judgment, held that as a fresh classification list was not filed, the Appellants could only have the....