Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (2) TMI 122

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his common order as the impugned Order in Civil Appeal No. 3409/2004 and 5084/2004 merely follows the order impugned in Civil Appeal No. 7262/2003. 2.The question involved in these cases is whether an intermediate product manufactured by the Respondent, namely, tyre bead wire ring, is excisable to duty. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that it was excisable to duty relying upon : (a) the fact....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Panaji - Goa v. M.R.F. Ltd. reported in 2000 (115) E.L.T. 85. The Commissioner distinguished the decision by holding that in this case there was proof of marketability. 4.The Tribunal has reversed the decision of the Commissioner holding that there is no proof of marketability and therefore the earlier decision continue....