1994 (3) TMI 116
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ignment of Lauryl Alcohol with C.I.F. value of Rs. 2,62,206/-. The petitioners filed Bill of Entry for home consumption and sought clearance against Appendix 6(1) of AM 1985-88 policy. The Customs Authorities felt that the clearance under OGL was not tenable and the goods were liable to confiscation under Section 111 (d) of the Customs Act. The petitioners were served with a show cause notice and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tioners preferred the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to challenge the legality of the order. Pending the petition, the petitioners also preferred Appeal before the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay. The Collector of Customs by order dated October 29, 1985 dismissed the appeal but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 2,000/-. The appellate authority came to the conclusion....
TaxTMI