2025 (9) TMI 1170

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....& ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. For the Petitioner: Ms. Anshu Mehta, through VC,. For the Petitioner: Mr. Akhil Krishna Maggu, through VC,. For the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma with Niyati Mankad, through VC,. ORDER:-   (PER M.S. SONAK, J.) 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ities for a refund of the pre-deposit amount. Despite receiving this representation, to date, neither a refund has been made nor has the representation been responded to, forcing the Petitioners to institute these petitions. 8. Considering the above facts, no point would be served in simply issuing directions to the Respondents to dispose of the representation as suggested by Mr. Sharma, the le....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re us. In fact, there is nothing to show that an Appeal has been preferred against the CESTAT order. 11. Therefore, we direct the Respondents to refund the pre-deposit amount together with interest at the prescribed rate within four weeks from the date of uploading of this order, unless, in the meantime, the Respondents appeal the order dated 05 August 2024 and obtain any interim orders in such....