IP suspended two years for engaging related party, failing to file avoidance application under Regulation 35A, and charging excessive fees

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC dismissed the petition and upheld the Disciplinary Committee's order suspending the IP's registration for two years (effective 16.09.2022) and directing refund of half the fees paid to a related professional firm. The HC affirmed findings that the IP engaged a related party improperly, failed to file an avoidance application in breach of Regulation 35A, and caused payment of excessive fees contrary to the Liquidation Regulations. The court found procedural compliance by the regulator despite an inspection order issued by an improper officer, and concluded the DC reasonably determined that services charged duplicated the liquidator's functions. Relief sought by the IP was refused.....