Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (9) TMI 964

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing Counsel For CBIC ORDER: PER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY Heard Ms. Y.Siri Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the CBIC for respondent No.1. Perused the record. 2. The instant is a writ petition which has been filed assailing the order-in-original dated 21.04.2025 passed by the first respondent, located in Mahar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2012(6) TMI 76 Delhi High Court - LB] and the petitioner has also relied upon a recent decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of PI INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs. THE UNION OF INDIA [2025(4) TMI 381 Bombay High Court]. 5. As regards the aspect of limitation is concerned, it has been pointed out by the learned Standing Counsel for the department that in fact the impugned order itself speaks as to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... department and which has been got tested from the laboratory have been duly considered by the first respondent or not, is again a matter of fact finding for which again the appellate body is the best forum which can deal with the said issue, not this High Court in the course of invoking the powers conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. So far as the reliance given to the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e forum which is located in Maharashtra and the writ petition is being filed in the State of Telangana. The petitioner having subjected themselves to the jurisdiction of the first respondent located in Maharashtra cannot now be permitted to avail the writ remedy before a altogether different jurisdictional High Court in the course of challenging an order passed by the officer in Maharashtra, even ....