2002 (1) TMI 82
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ombay and thereafter he had gone to London on 13th October, 2001 and did the business there and at present he has come to Dubai and is likely to come to Bombay. He further submitted that on 21st of September, 2001 his statement has been recorded by the DRI office and, therefore, it cannot be said by any stretch of imagination that applicant No. 1 was absconding. He submitted that the applicant is ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er submitted that such chemical is less priced and therefore by doing all these activities applicant No. 1 has earned wrongful gain of amount which goes to one crore forty lacs. He further submitted that the attempts were made by the Department to serve the notices on him but as he was not available, the notices could not be served on him but they were served on his family members. Shri Mehta subm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng in view a different set of facts and circumstances. That was the case which was dealing with FERA offence or offences. In the present case the prosecution is sure that applicant No. 1 obtained high quality chemicals, changed it and made it low quality and exported it by showing that, it was high quality chemical and earned lot of money. Obviously this case is pertaining to examination of docume....
TaxTMI