2025 (9) TMI 313
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... For the Petitioners: Mr. Sujit Sahoo a/w Ms. Ira Mishra,. For the Respondents: Mr. Karan Adik a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Mr. Umesh Gupta,. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to the Order-in-Original dated 22 January 2025. As against the impugned order, the Petitioner has a remedy of an Appeal. The only contention raised before us was ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Certificates based upon which foreign remittances to the extent of over Rs. 100 crores were facilitated without making any deduction towards the taxes that would have otherwise become payable. The impugned order states that such certificates were issued without any proper verification or scrutiny. 5. At this stage, it is not for us to examine the merits or demerits of the impugned order or the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pre-deposit may not be correct. This plea is raised only to avoid making a pre-deposit. 8. In the case of Oberoi Constructions Limited V/s. Union of India And Ors., Writ Petition (L) No. 33260 of 2023, we have referred to several decisions of this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court, on the issue of exhaustion of alternate remedies. By following the reasoning in the said decision and the decisi....
TaxTMI