Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 2092

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rtikeyan - Ld.DR ORDER PER MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER): 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year [in short referred to as 'AY'] 2011-12 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2, Pune [in short referred to as 'CIT(A)'], Appeal No.(new)PN/CIT(A)-2/ACIT-Cir-1/KYN/211/2017-18; Appeal No.(old): THN/CIT(A)-2/ACIT-Cir-1/KYN/40/2015-16 dated 14/11/20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee which was followed by statutory notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1). The original return of income filed by the assessee on 24/09/2011 was processed u/s 143(1). 2.2 The assessee could not substantiate delivery of material with cogent evidences and also failed to produce any of the suppliers to confirm the transactions. Notices sent u/s 133(6) to all the suppliers to confirm the transactions did not ....