Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Revision under section 263 set aside for exceeding limited scrutiny under section 142(1); Section 14A and Rule 8D issues excluded

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT set aside the revision order passed by PCIT under section 263, holding it to be beyond the scope of a limited scrutiny assessment. The AO had issued notice under section 142(1) for limited scrutiny and the assessee furnished requisite details; alleged failures to verify salary income and to disallow amounts under section 14A read with Rule 8D fall outside the permissible ambit of limited scrutiny. PCIT could not validly initiate revision on issues requiring complete scrutiny without obtaining prior sanction from the CIT. The Tribunal quashed the impugned revision as unauthorized and procedurally infirm for exceeding the limited scrutiny mandate.....