2025 (9) TMI 52
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....AS) Appearance:- For the Appellant: Mr. Vinay Shraff Mr. Dev Agarwal Ms. S. Podder Ms. Priya Sarah Paul. For the State: Mr. Amitabrata Roy, Ld. G.P. Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty Mr. Saptak Sanyal. JUDGMENT PER (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. The writ petitioner is the appellant before us, having been unsuccessful in challenging an order of adjudication dated 24th July, 2024. On an earli....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as recorded in the Fastag Portal, cannot be accessed by the appellant and in this regard, the Department ought to have co-operated with the appellant and provided necessary details. 4. Furthermore, learned advocate has also sought to canvass certain grounds as regards the effect of the statements given by the supplier during the cross-examination etc. In our considered view, to test the correctn....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d not be permitted to bypass the statutory appellate remedy. 7. Therefore, we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Bench. 8. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed along with the connected application (I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2025) with a direction to the appellant to file a statutory appeal before the appellate authority and if such an appeal is filed within a perio....