2002 (2) TMI 109

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ral)]. - The Assessing Authority found the petitioner liable to deposit excise duty to the tune of Rs. 4,27,972-00. A penalty of Rs. 42,000-00 was also imposed. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner filed an appeal. It was dismissed by the Appellate Authority. The petitioner, then, approached the CEGAT with an appeal. An application dated September 27, 1999 was also filed with the prayer that the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., there is no ground either for modification of the Stay Order or further extension of time. We, therefore dismiss the appeal for non-compliance with the statutory requirement of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944." Hence, this petition. 2. In response to the notice of motion, a reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner has filed a rejoinder. Counsel for t....