2025 (8) TMI 1699
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....handra And Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh JJ. For the Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Yadav For the Respondent(s) : C.S.C. ORDER 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the State-respondent nos.1 to 3. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following prayers:- "I. To issue a ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ne by petitioner-firm between period March 2023 till end of February 2024 and refusal for payment of same. II. To issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding to respondent no.2 and 3 to make payment of withheld or katuti amount of Rs. 78,60,260/-( Rupees Seventy Eight Laks Sixty Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Onlyj with GST against above-mentioned three bills bearing Invo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....usand Nine Hundred Ten only), within stipulated time period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. IV. Any other order which this Hon'ble Court may think fit." 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by the counsel appearing for the State-respondents to the maintainability of the petition and he has pointed out Page no.131 of the Paper book, Clauses 56 and 57 of the Contract signed be....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... a letter dated 12.06.2025 written by the petitioner to the Transport Commissioner asking for the reasons of making deductions in the payment due to it. It has been submitted that till date no reply has been given to the petitioner. He does not know what is the reason for such deductions and therefore cannot apply under Paragraph-56 of the Contract signed by him. 6. The writ petition is dispose....
TaxTMI