Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (11) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt per : Jawahar Lal Gupta, J. (Oral)]. - Respondent No. 1 is engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicle parts. It claimed Modvat credit. The adjudicating authority came to the conclusion that the credit had been claimed on the basis of forged/fake invoices. Thus, the respondent was called upon to pay an amount of Rs. 1,52,159.14. The appeal filed by the respondent having been dismissed, it appro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of forged/fake invoices ? (2)        Whether the fraud committed by Respondent No. 1 and detected by the Assessing Officer after seeking clarification from the Deputy Commissioner and the assessment made by the Assessing Officer in good faith which was earlier to the detection of fraud amounts to knowledge on the part of the Assessing Officer and merits deno....