2025 (8) TMI 1441
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....athamesh P. Bhosle,. P. C. 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. With the consent of the parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking to quash and set aside an order dated 31st March, 2025 passed by Respondent No. 1 rejecting the Petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing Form No. 10 for the assessment year 2016-17. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....an Application for condonation of delay before Respondent No. 1 under section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act on 27th November, 2018. In this Application, the Petitioner sought for a condonation of delay of 522 days in filing Form No. 10. 4. Respondent No. 1, by the impugned order, refused to condone the delay on the ground that no "reasonable cause" was shown for the aforesaid delay. Respondent ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....,050 in a meeting held on 15th October, 2016. They also signed Form No. 10 in the paper format which was tabled at the said meeting. 6. In fact, in the affidavit it is stated that while presenting the accounts for the A.Y. 2016-17, the Chartered Accountant brought to the attention of the Trustees the fact that the Trust has to spent the required amount of 85% of the receipts and there was a short....