2025 (8) TMI 1339
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gadeesan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Punit Agarwwal, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Rajsingh Rathore, Adv. Ms. Mrinal Kanwar, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Dhananjay Baijal, AOR Mr. Tilak Singh, Adv ORDER Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 12.07.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Crl.R.C. No.64 of 2021....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....housand Four Hundred Ninety Three) but the High Court forcing a sort of compounding without any justification and holding that by paying a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) as compensation, the imprisonment would be waived, is totally unjustified. It was submitted that the cheque issued in the year 2012 and the loan was taken in the year 2010 and even the principal amount was returned onl....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 6. Having considered the matter, we had clearly observed that a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) was totally inadequate by way of compensation to the appellant of their sufferings in proportion to the relief expected by the respondent from the Courts. The party who has suffered has to be compensated in realistic terms and not by way of a token amount which in the present case, we fin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d to the aforesaid, the present appeal stands disposed of by directing the respondent to pay an additional amount of Rs.3,62,493/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Sixty Two Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Three) over and above the principal amount of Rs.3,62,493/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Sixty Two Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Three) which he may have paid to the appellant, within a period of eight weeks from today. ....
TaxTMI