Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (8) TMI 132

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Lal Gupta, J.]. - On September 15, 2000, The Commissioner, Central Excise (Adj.) raised a demand for Rs. 4,78,37,028/- by way of payment of excise duty. A penalty of 100%, viz. Rs. 4,78,37,028/- was also imposed. Interest at the rate of 20% was also levied. Still further, an additional penalty of Rs. 30,00,000/- each was imposed on the two partners, viz. petitioner Nos. 2 and 3. Another penalty ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s prayed that the order of the Tribunal be quashed. 3.Notice of motion was issued. A written statement has been filed. 4.Counsels for the parties have been heard. 5.On April 5, 2001 the case was posted before a Bench of this Court consisting of Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Singhvi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nirmal Singh. Their Lordships were pleased to direct petitioner No. 1 to deposit Rs. 50 l....