Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (9) TMI 101

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ahar Lal Gupta, J. (Oral)]. - The Revenue has filed this petition under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It claims that the following question of law arises for the opinion of this Court : - "Whether circumstantial evidence placed on records is not sufficient to prove the clandestine manufacture and removal of the goods?" 2.Mr. Gumber, learned Counsel for the Revenue contends ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... has been made out to substantiate the allegation that the yarn supplied to DGS & D was the yarn manufactured by the appellants themselves in their mill. For establishing the allegation of such a nature, we consider that type of material placed on record, was not alone sufficient." 5.We find that no material has been placed on record to controvert the conclusion drawn. 6.The case was posted ....