2025 (8) TMI 1306
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Appellant. Shri B. Subhas Chandra Bose, AR for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per: A.K. JYOTISHI] M/s Mahalakshmi and Company (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) are in appeal against Order-in-Appeal dt. 26.02.2015, whereby, the Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected their appeal, which they had filed against Order-in-Original dt. 28.09.2012. The Commissioner (Appeals) exami....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....[2023 (8) TMI 949 - CESTAT Hyderabad], the Coordinate Benches have examined this issue and held that no deduction of duty can be allowed. He further submits that in the appellant's own case, in the past, in Final Order No.30376/2023 dt. 03.11.2023, similar order has been passed by this Bench following the precedent decisions of this Tribunal and the appeals were dismissed. 4. Heard both sides a....
TaxTMI