Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Comparison of Section 25 "Interpretation" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on date: Not stated in the document. Background & Scope Statutory hooks: Clause 25 provides an interpretation for the term "owner" for the purposes of sections 20 to 24 (Chapter IV-C - Income from house property) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version). The provision enumerates categories of persons who shall be treated as "owner" in relation to a property. The text furnishes no additional definitions beyond the list; it does not define other terms appearing in the clause (e.g., "impartible estate") within the document. Not stated in the document: legislative history, Parliamentary debates, or stated policy intent behind this definition. Statutory Provision Mode Text & Scope Coverage: Clause 25 applies "for the purposes of sections ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ch property. Definitions within text: The clause is an inclusive list ("shall include"), signalling that other persons may also be "owners" under general principles. No further definitions (for terms such as "impartible estate", "adequate consideration", "agreement to live apart", or "enabling the enjoyment") are provided in the document. Interpretation Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The clause aims to cast a wide net to tax the economic enjoyment or control of immovable residential property. It treats transfers lacking adequate consideration to close relatives (spouse and minor child other than married daughter) as not removing the transferor's status as "owner" for house-property purposes. It ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion under a contract covered by section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is included as "owner" while in possession pursuant to that part performance arrangement (clause 25(d)). Interplay Interaction with other provisions: Clause 25 is expressly confined to sections 20-24 (income from house property). It references section 53A, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, to link part-performance possession to ownership for tax purposes. Not stated in the document: operational rules, Forms, or circulars interpreting these clauses, or interaction with gift/transfer provisions elsewhere in the Bill or the Income-tax Act. Differences between Section 25 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 [As Passed] and Clause 25 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....roperty income taxation without the need for further factual inquiry. It increases administrative certainty and could increase tax exposure for holders of impartible estates. * Reference to Transfer of Property Act year: The Old Version cites "section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882)"; the As Passed text lists "section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1982)". * Practical impact: The As Passed citation appears to contain a typographical error in the parenthetical year or number ("1982" instead of "1882"). If taken literally, it introduces a drafting inaccuracy. Practically, courts and practitioners will rely on the statutory text and historical position that the Transfer of Property Act is 1882; the er....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to demonstrate adequate consideration), agreements to live apart (where relevant), lease durations (to confirm whether excluded short leases apply), allotment/lease documents from co-operative societies, possession u/s 53A arrangements, and documents showing the nature and term of any rights acquired (sale, exchange, original or extendible lease of 12 years or more) will be material. Not stated in the document: specific documentary thresholds or form requirements. Key Takeaways * Clause 25 provides an inclusive definition of "owner" for sections 20-24 (income from house property), capturing transfers without adequate consideration to specified relatives, holders of impartible estates, cooperative allottees, part-performance possessees an....