Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (3) TMI 101

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tribunal declining to condone the delay on the part of the Revenue in filing the appeal before it and, therefore, dismissing the appeal. 2.The respondent had claimed that 'acrylamide' was a synthetic adhesive and, therefore, entitled to duty free clearance against value based advanced licences pertaining to the export of leather goods. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs rejected the claim.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....led the appeal before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal whereon the order under challenge was passed. It sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal setting out in some detail the reason for which the appeal had been filed after the period of limitation. The Tribunal declined to condone the delay, taking the view that the judgment of this Court in Ajit Singh Thakur & A....