Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Extended limitation period denied for service tax on cable retransmission; Cenvat credit restricted under Rule 4(7)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The CESTAT held that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked for recovery of service tax on cable operator services involving re-transmission of broadcast signals, restricting the demand to the normal limitation period. The Tribunal affirmed the disallowance of Cenvat credit claimed beyond one year from the date of invoice in accordance with Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, rejecting credit taken outside the prescribed timeframe. Penalties under Section 78 were set aside due to the inapplicability of the extended limitation period. The matter was remanded to the original authority for re-quantification of the demand within the normal limitation period. The appeal was partly allowed by way of remand.....