2025 (8) TMI 780
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....For the Petitioner : Mr.R.Ananth for Mr.K.S.Prakash For the Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 17.02.2025, whereby the demand proposed in the notice in Form DRC-01 dated 12.12.2024 has been confirmed. 2. The petitioner had also filed a reply prior to the issuance of the impugned order. 3. By the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n on 27.01.2025. Therefore, it is contended that the imposition of penalty and late fee is unjust and warrants interference. 6. However, this Court finds that the petitioner has an alternate remedy under the statute. Further, no procedural irregularity or legal infirmity is discernible while passing of the impugned order. The impugned order also cannot be said to be unreasonable. 7. In view ....


TaxTMI