Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (8) TMI 780

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For the Petitioner : Mr.R.Ananth for Mr.K.S.Prakash For the Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 17.02.2025, whereby the demand proposed in the notice in Form DRC-01 dated 12.12.2024 has been confirmed. 2. The petitioner had also filed a reply prior to the issuance of the impugned order. 3. By the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n on 27.01.2025. Therefore, it is contended that the imposition of penalty and late fee is unjust and warrants interference. 6. However, this Court finds that the petitioner has an alternate remedy under the statute. Further, no procedural irregularity or legal infirmity is discernible while passing of the impugned order. The impugned order also cannot be said to be unreasonable. 7. In view ....