Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (12) TMI 93

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d company engaged amongst other things in manufacture of caustic soda for which it uses titanium anodes as an input. It claimed Modvat credit for Excise duty paid by it on purchase of titanium from 23-8-1986 to 29-4-1989 and refund of Rs. 43,96,116.42 on this count. The case set up was that though it had received such benefit earlier also up to 28-2-1982 pursuant to Notification No. 201/79 but it ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion 11B and that it was time barred having been filed expiry of prescribed period of 6 months. 2.Feeling aggrieved the company filed M.P. No. 599/91 seeking declaration that it was entitled to Modvat credit under Notification No. 177/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986 and mandamus directing appellants to refund the paid excise duty. This petition was resisted by appellants primarily on the ground that co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., it cannot be overlooked that respondent company had rushed to invoke writ jurisdiction of this court without exhausting the provided statutory remedies. Nor could it be washed away that forums provided by the statute were best suited to examine the grievance and resolve the dispute. It is understandable that company may have strategically chosen to take to writ remedy for its own reasons perhaps....