Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (7) TMI 105

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... running a factory to manufacture grey cotton fabrics for export. It claimed the benefit of export promotion capital goods scheme providing 'zero duty' under Notification 111/95, dated 5-6-1995 and obtained an import licence to import plant and machinery worth Rs. 21 crores. It's licence was valid for 24 months and was later extended up to 6-8-1998. 2. Appellant imported plant and machinery wor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ry of Finance. It was also contended that the appellant had failed to present the Bill of Entries for clearance of goods and the machinery imported, therefore, could not be assessed. Instead of awaiting for such assessment against which appellant had an alternative remedy under the Customs Act a writ petition was filed to forestall assessment. 5. Upon this writ Court rejected appellant's writ p....