2025 (7) TMI 1151
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....CBIC with Mr. Jai Ahuja, Adv. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-Rakesh Kumar Jat under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the Order-in-Original dated 27th May 2025 passed by the Office of Commissioner of Customs (hereinafter, 'impugned order'). The present ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sued, the impugned order has been passed. According to the Petitioner, he had appointed an Authorized Representative to appear before the Customs Department and seek release of the said gold piece in terms of the impugned order. However, the same was not permitted. Hence, this petition. 5. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner further submits that the Petitioner is an eligible passenger and is willing t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sh Kumar Jat and detained vide DR No. "DR/INDEL4/26.04.2024/0052619 dt. 26.04.2024" under section 111(d),111(i),11 1(j) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962; 3. I give an option to redeem the goods confiscated above, on payment of a fine of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 and allow the same for "re-export" from India as the Pax has residency ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and with an undertaking to re-export. In addition penalty of Rs. 30,000/- has been imposed. 8. Since the Petitioner has already agreed to abide by the impugned order, let the impugned order be given effect to by the Customs Department within a period of two weeks from now and the said gold piece shall be released to the Petitioner upon the payment of the amounts in terms of the said order. 9. A....