Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (11) TMI 89

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... India the petitioner challenges inter alia the order dated 23-4-1996 of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, by which it dismissed the petitioner's appeal for non-compliance of the conditions of pre-deposit under Section 35F and the order dated 22-8-1996 by which the Tribunal dismissed the restoration application. 2.The petitioner had filed an appeal against the levy of e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1996 in the presence of the petitioner's counsel. He could not inform the Tribunal about the compliance of the Tribunal's earlier order and, therefore, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the pre-condition of deposit under Section 35F. Thus, the petitioner did not apprise the Tribunal that a writ petition was pending in the High Court nor did it apprise this court that its appeal had al....