1999 (4) TMI 81
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....order of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals) Pune, dated 12-3-1999 (Exhibit `A' to the writ petition) by which the application of the petitioners for dispensation of the requirement of pre-deposit of duty under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, has been rejected and the petitioners have been directed to deposit the full amount of disputed duty and penalty on or befo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bmits that this order is liable to be quashed and set aside with costs. 5.Mr. Deodhar, learned Counsel for the respondents, fairly stated that so far as the impugned order is concerned, he cannot defend the same because it is an unreasoned one. He stated that he would like to issue necessary instruction to the respondents to pass reasoned orders in future. He, therefore, stated that in the fact....
TaxTMI