2022 (12) TMI 1572

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arned counsel for the respondents stated had been issued - is acted upon and necessary arrangements are made to shift the goods to warehouse as soon as possible in any event, within the period of two weeks from that date (that is 30.11.2022). 2. It is material to note that the said direction was issued in the backdrop of earlier orders passed by this court. The above captioned writ petition was listed for the first time on 28.03.2022 before a co-ordinate bench of this court. On the said date, this court had issued notice and directed that the counter affidavit be filed within a period of three weeks. The petition was directed to be listed on 7.03.2022 and the court also directed as under: "In the meanwhile, the petitioner will have the l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in compliance of order of Hon'ble High Court as mentioned above, the five Containers No. BSIU2703144, TEMU1955242, FCIU5179310, KOCU2133992 and CAIU3885618 are allowed for warehousing. 3. However, as you have not requested to warehousing the said goods at any particular refrigerated public or private warehouse. Therefore, you are requested to arrange the space in public or private warehouse where the refrigeration fadlity available and provide the warehousing certificate at the earliest so that the goods can be warehoused accordingly." 5. The said letter was followed by another letter of the same date, which reads as under: "Subject: Compliance of order of High Court in WP (C) No. 5038/2022 dated 18.04.2022-reg.  As per th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ni Logistics Park. This is evident from the letter dated 07.12.2022 addressed to the warehoused M/s Adani Logistics Park. A copy of another letter indicating the above was also addressed to the authorised representative of the petitioner. 11. We express our displeasure on a manner in which the respondents have proceeded. There has been no clarity on the part of the concerned officer of the respondents in regard to warehousing the goods in question. In the event, the concerned officer wanted the goods to be shifted to the particular warehouse - which is apparent from the communications as noted above - the least the concerned officer could have done was to inform the petitioner in this regard. 12. The learned counsel appearing for the peti....