Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Revisionary Powers under the Income Tax Law : Clause 377 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....existing Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Both provisions empower the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner (and other designated authorities) to revise orders passed by the Assessing Officer or Transfer Pricing Officer, subject to certain conditions and procedural safeguards. This commentary provides an in-depth analysis of Clause 377, exploring its objectives, detailed provisions, interpretative challenges, and practical implications. It further undertakes a clause-wise comparison with Section 263, highlighting the similarities, differences, and the potential impact of the proposed legislative changes. Objective and Purpose The primary objective of both Clause 377 and Section 263 is to safeguard the interests of the revenue by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ncludes: * Enhancing or modifying the assessment, or cancelling it and directing a fresh assessment. * Modifying or cancelling orders u/s 166 (relating to transfer pricing adjustments), and directing fresh orders under that section. The provision thus covers a broad range of orders and grants the Competent Authority wide discretion, subject to procedural safeguards. 2. Orders Covered by Revision (Sub-section 2) Clause 377(2) clarifies what constitutes an "order" for the purpose of revision: * Orders of assessment made on the basis of directions issued by the Joint Commissioner u/s 272. * Orders made by the Joint Commissioner acting as AO or TPO under powers conferred by the Board or higher authorities u/s 241. * Orders u/s 166 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....od: * Time taken in giving an opportunity to the assessee to be reheard u/s 244(2). * Period during which proceedings are stayed by a court order. * Sub-section 7: If, after exclusion, the remaining period is less than 60 days, it is deemed extended to 60 days. These provisions ensure that the revisionary authority has adequate time to exercise its powers, while protecting the assessee from indefinite uncertainty. 5. Definitions (Sub-section 8) Sub-section 8 defines "Competent Authority" and "Transfer Pricing Officer" for the purposes of this section, ensuring precision in the identification of empowered officers. Comparative Analysis with Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 1. Authority Empowered * Both provisions empower ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....opportunity of being heard before any revisionary order is passed, upholding natural justice. * Both allow the Competent Authority to make or cause to be made such inquiry as deemed necessary. 5. Limitation Period and Exclusions * Section 263 provides a two-year limitation from the end of the financial year in which the order was passed, with exceptions for orders passed to give effect to appellate findings or directions. * Clause 377 replicates this framework, with minor updates in language and cross-referencing. Both provide for exclusion of time spent on rehearing and during court-ordered stay, and both extend the limitation to 60 days if the remaining period is less than that after exclusions. 6. Matters Decided in Appeal * Bo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es may arise regarding the scope of issues considered in appeal versus those open to revision. * Transfer Pricing Orders: The explicit inclusion of TPO orders and cross-referencing of new sections may require transitional clarifications, especially for ongoing cases straddling the old and new legislative frameworks. * Nature of "Record": Both provisions define "record" broadly, but practical disputes may arise as to whether new evidence can be considered during revision or whether the authority is confined to the record as it existed at the time of the original order. * Extension of Limitation: The provision for extension to 60 days after exclusions is clear, but its application may give rise to disputes in complex cases involving mul....