Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Business payments to parent company in normal course don't qualify as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) (22)(e)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The HC held that payments made by appellant to parent company in normal course of business as commercial transactions do not constitute deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e). The court relied on precedential decisions from Punjab and Haryana HC and Delhi HC, which established that trade advances made for business expediency are not treated as advances attracting deemed dividend provisions. The Supreme Court's dismissal of revenue's appeal against Punjab and Haryana HC judgment reinforced this position. Subsequently, CBDT issued Circular No.19 of 2017 acknowledging this settled legal position, directing department officers not to file appeals on this ground and withdraw existing ones. The HC concluded that ITAT's remand order was uncalled for and any consequential orders detrimental to assessee would be rendered bad in law, effectively settling the issue in favor of taxpayer.....