1996 (11) TMI 87

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... India the petitioner, U.P. Cement Corporation Ltd., a Corporation of the State of U.P. challenges the order dated 28-2-1990, copy of which is Annexure-3 to the writ petition passed by respondent No. 4 raising a demand of Rs. 3,72,519.90 for the period January, 1986 to November, 1995 under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act and an order dated 30-12-1993, a copy of which is Annexure-8 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and 916 of 1995 which were decided by me vide judgment dated 18-12-1995 and were allowed holding that the losses were natural and since there was no fraud collusion, wilful suppression of the facts etc., the demand could not be raised after the expiry of the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11-A of the Act. The writ petition was therefore, allowed and the impugned orders were quashed....