Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Appeals allowed by remand in customs classification dispute over odoriferous compound mixtures under Customs Tariff Act headings

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CESTAT allowed appeals by remand in a customs classification dispute involving mixtures of odoriferous compounds. The appellant challenged classification under heading 3302.90.90 versus 3302.10 of the Customs Tariff Act, seeking concessional duty rates under Notification 21/2002-Cus. The tribunal found that both parties agreed the matter required fresh examination by the original authority. Following precedent from Bangalore Bench in Giavudan Indian case, CESTAT emphasized the necessity to determine whether imported flavour compounds were specifically of a kind used for beverage manufacture. The impugned order was set aside and remitted to the jurisdictional adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication with specific directions to render categorical findings on the beverage-use classification issue while adhering to natural justice principles.....