Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

NCLAT rejects 280-day delay condonation for appeal refiling due to insufficient cause and casual conduct under Rule 26(2)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NCLAT dismissed the application for condonation of 280 days delay in refiling appeal by power of attorney holder of erstwhile director of corporate debtor. The appellant failed to establish sufficient cause for inordinate delay, offering vague and unsubstantiated explanations regarding unavailability of documents managed by director's father-in-law and health issues. The tribunal found the appellant's conduct casual and lacking diligence in pursuing defect rectification within prescribed seven-day period under Rule 26(2) of NCLAT Rules, 2016. Emphasizing that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC is time-bound, the tribunal held such delay undermines expeditious resolution objectives and statutory timelines, warranting dismissal of condonation application.....