Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (7) TMI 30

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amani, CA For the Respondent : Smt. Leena Lal, Senior AR ORDER PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM : The present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre / learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals ["CIT(A)" for short] dated 17th March, 2025, and relates to assessment year 2013-2014. 2. At the outset, we find that the solitary issue involved ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ench has observed as under:- "8. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material available on record. Copy of the assessment order dated 09.10.2018 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act is placed on record. On perusal of the same, it is seen that it has merely mentioned that penalty proceedings have been initiated separately. A copy of the notice issued u/s. 274 of the Act for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....w of the matter, we find that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act on the respondent/assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 cannot be legally sustained." 9. In the instant case, it is an undisputed fact that the assessment order and the notice issued u/s. 274 is vague and is not clear under which limb the penalty has been initiated. Therefore, in the light o....