2025 (7) TMI 58
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tioner/s : Mr. Bijay Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mr. Alok Swaroop, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-7. For the UOI : Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC Mr. Shivaditya Dhani Sinha, Advocate. For the Resp No. 5 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Sr. Advocate Ms. Manini Jaiswal, Advocate Mr. Shubham Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate. ORAL ORDER (PER: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) Heard Mr. Bijay Kumar Gupta, learned counsel assisted by Mr. Alok Swaroop, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Shashi, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vivek Prasad, learned GP-7 for the State Respondents. Respondent no. 5 has entered appearance through Mr. Sanjeev Kumar M....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t to the notices issued to respondent no. 5 and respondent no. 6 calling upon them to show cause as to why appropriate proceeding be not initiated against them for their willful disobedience and disregard shown to the order of this Court passed in the case of SIS Cash Services Private Limited vs. Union of India in CWJC No. 6514 of 2021 dated 24.01.2024. 5. Respondent no. 5 and respondent no. 6 have filed their respective show cause. Respondent no. 5 has taken a plea that the order dated 24.08.2023 was passed by her after verifying from the GST-BO Portal, Back office and the order dated 12.09.2019 has been passed in terms of Section 73 of the Central/Bihar Goods and Services Act, 2017. Relevant extract of the portal demand and collection ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pology and at the same time, they have disclosed the reason for passing of the impugned orders. 9. No rejoinder to the show cause filed on behalf of respondent no. 5 and respondent no. 6 has been filed by the petitioner, therefore, the statements made therein remained uncontroverted. In the circumstances, this Court accepts the reasons shown by respondent nos. 5 and 6. The notice for initiation of contempt is not required to be proceeded with. 10. Now, the issue remained with respect to interest and cost to the petitioner. The matter was heard and learned Advocate General sought time to seek instruction. 11. Today, when the matter has been called out, learned Advocate General submits on instruction that the State respondents shall ....
TaxTMI