TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (6) TMI 2007
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er u/s.143(1) of ITA, 1961 is passed without adhering to the requisite procedures of issuance of proposed adjustment u/s.143(1)(a) of the ITA, 1961 violating "principle of natural justice" and making order u/s.143(1) of the ITA, 1961 as bad in law. 3. Appellant trust contends that Form 10B has been filed before filing the return of income and before due date u/s.139(4) of the ITA, 1961. As such all the compliances were ensured by the appellant trust and therefore eligible for exemption u/s.11 of the ITA, 1961 for the amount spent actually. 4. Appellant trust contends that delay in filing Form No. 10B is merely a technical default and is curable as held by various High Courts." 5. Alternatively, and without prejudice, the learned AO erred in law and on facts in assessing total income at Rs. 1,72,07,533/-, without granting deduction for genuine and bonafide expenses incurred for the object of the trust amounting to Rs. 1,49,19,496/-. 6. Appellant craves leave to add/alter/modify/amend/delete all or any of the grounds of appeal." 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Charitable Trust and return of income for A.Y.2020-21 furnished ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....10B filed by the assessee. We also notice that in the case of Bangarh Educational Welfare Trust Vs. ITO (Exemptions) - ITA No.496/Kol/2021 order dated 02.01.2022 the Coordinate Bench, Kolkata under similar set of facts and circumstances where a belated return has been filed u/s.139(4) of the Act and Audit Report has been furnished before the due date of filing return u/s.139(4), has examined the issue in detail and granted relief to the assessee observing as follows : "8. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the records placed before us. The assessee is a charitable trust established for imparting education to rural areas without any profit motive. It enjoys registration u/s 12AA of the Act granted vide order dated 12.09.2018 effective from A.Y 2018-19 onwards. It claimed benefit u/s 11 and 12 of the Act of Rs. 13587109/-. However, CPC while processing u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act denied the said exemption on account of two reasons; firstly the return of income was not filed before due date as prescribed u/s 139(4) of the Act and secondly audit report on Form 10B not uploaded before due date prescribed under the Act. Now, undisputedly in the case of assessee, the re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esentative assessee (the total income for this purpose being computed under this Act without giving effect to the provisions of sections 11 and 12) exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, furnish a return of such income of the previous year in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed and all the provisions of this Act shall, so far may be, apply as if it were a return required to be furnished under sub-section (1).]]" 10. Now, going through the provisions to section 139(4A) of the Act shows that the assessee is required to file the return as per the provisions of section 139(1) of the Act. Now, perusal of section 139(1) shows that in the case of the assessee which is required to get its account audited, the due date is 30.09.2018 and for A.Y 2018-19 this date was further extended to 31.10.2018 vide CBDT's order dated 24.09.2018. Now, since the assessee has filed the return on 15.11.2018, it is a belated return. Thus, there remains no dispute to the fact that the return of income filed by the assessee is a belated return which as per section 139(5) of the Act could h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....her condition that the person in receipt of the income chargeable to income tax shall furnish the return of income within the time allowed under section 139 of the Act. These amendments are clarificatory in nature. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2018 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to assessment year 2018-19 and subsequent years." 3. Additionally, an excerpt of circular 02/2018 dated 15.02.2018 "Explanatory Notes to the Provisions of the Finance Act, 2017" on insertion of clause (ba) in Sub section (1) of section 12A is quoted as under: "the entities registered under section 12AA are required to file return of income under sub-section (4A) of section 139 of the Income tax Act, if the total income without giving effect to the provisions of sections 11 and 12 exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax. Amendment to section 12A of the Income-tax has been made so as to provide for additional condition that the person in receipt of the income chargeable to income-tax shall furnish the return of income within the time allowed under section 139 of the Income-tax Act." 3. Thus, for a trust registered U/s ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....BDT Circular dated 23.04.2019, which are binding on the Revenue authorities, we are of the view that the assessee has fulfilled the conditions provided under sub-clause (ba) of section 12A(1) of the Act and has filed the return of income within the time allowed. 12. Now, the second reason for which lower authorities have denied the deduction u/s 11 of the Act is of filing the belated audit report on form 10B of the Act. Now, clause (b) of section 12A(1) of the Act provides for a condition that if the income of a trust exceeds a maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax in the previous year the account have to be audited and the person in receipt of such income furnishes the audit report before the specified date. In the case of the assessee, Form No.10B was to be filed and the relevant rule is rule 17B of the Income Tax Rules which provides that the report of audit of the accounts of a trust or institution which is required to be furnished under Clause (b) of section 12A, shall be in Form No. 10B. 13. Now, on perusal of the Form 10B, we notice that the same is required to be submitted electronically, one month prior to the due date of the filing of return of i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as claimed by the assessee due to technical glitches, the report was uploaded after filing the return of income. 15. Though the Hon'ble Court holds that the report should be considered even filed in the course of assessment proceedings, or before in appellate authority, however, we notice that in the instant case, the case of the assessee was not selected for scrutiny assessment and it was mere processing of return by the computer with the set program. Had it been the case of scrutiny proceeding u/s 143(3) of the Act, the case could have been different. The ld. A.O may had an opportunity to go through the audit report. But still when the issue came before ld. CIT(A) who also possesses co-terminus power with that of A.O and as per section 251(1)(a) of the Act, the Id. CIT(A) in disposing the appeal against order of assessment has the power to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment, therefore, though, it was not possible to entertain the audit report while processing the return u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act, but the ld. CIT(A) was well within its power to have entertained the said report and examined the same as could have been done by the A.O. 16. We, the....