Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 2031

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ons)<br>Dated:- 20-6-2025<br>Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12858 of 2024 - -<br>GST<br>HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH For the Petitioners : Mr. Samir Kumar, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Vivek Prasad (GP 7) Ms. Supragya (AC to GP 7) Ms. Roona (AC to GP 7) Mr. Sanjay Kumar (AC to GP 7) Mrs. Manisha Singh (AC to GP 7) ORDER ( Per : H....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate writ quashing/ setting aside the Summary of demand issued in form DRC 07-order dated 18.01.2024 (Reference No.ZD100124015529X) (Annexure-P/3) passed by Respondent No. 3 for the year APR-2020-Mar-2021 whereby and whereunder the order has been passed under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act, 2017, imposing the demand worth Rs. 98,28,364/-for recovery of tax; (iii) For issuance of a writ, ord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that impugned action of the respondent insofar as passing the order, it is without hearing him. It is submitted that notices were issued through email. Petitioner&#39;s email is not connected with the GST registration, therefore, he has no occasion to have the benefit of receipt of notice. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the res....