Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

ITAT deletes unexplained credits addition under Section 68 as seized materials belonged to third parties without proper linkage to assessee

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal regarding unexplained credits u/s 68, holding that seized materials belonged to Rama Group entities based on Panchnama records, not the assessee, and additions cannot be made against third parties without proper linkage. For cash transactions, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion after AO accepted unreconciled amount of Rs. 42.79 lakhs and assessee surrendered Rs. 52.50 lakhs. Book balance addition was restricted to Rs. 6.35 lakhs excluding opening balance. Sales addition was rejected as assessee being director is separate from company without corporate veil lifting. Jewellery addition was deleted based on affidavits proving ownership by in-laws. Cattle feed trading matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with proper hearing opportunity.....